Step out of the professional bubble
Four times a year, we gather around a complex question — with people who see the world differently.
You spend most of your time with people who speak the same professional language.
An artists sees the world different. A philosopher will ask different questions. A technologists will find other possibilities. An ecologist feels systemic approach for real.
Where Lab and Bespoke revolve around a question inside your organisation, Field goes a step further: toward what’s changing in the society around your organisation. You find that at the edge: where two worlds touch, more emerges than in the middle of either alone. Field is that edge.
Different lenses
Same question
What happens
Field is an atelier session in Amsterdam:
we share a meal and select one of the questions we bring,
we sharpen together and turn into a concrete next move to test.
Land → Encounter → Explore → Concrete → Share
With a small group, deliberately including people from outside L&D and HR — that's where the different view comes from. And with four of these sessions a year, you build something a single session never gives you: real rhythm, with room for contact of your own between sessions.
2027
January
April
September
November
Who it's for
Lab alumni, invited after their Lab
Senior learning professionals with experience in systems, who want to create movement in them
Or on request — selected based on your question and contribution
Rhythm & investment
4x a year — rhythm instead of a single moment
€50 per session, or €75 per year
Starting: January 2027
Who is welcome
You bring the question
A broader change theme with a learning aspect that's stuck — whether you're an L&D professional or not, and whether it plays out in your team, your whole organisation, or the wider society around it. Think digital collaboration, employee resilience, building a curriculum around a whole school and its environment, or a societal project you want to move forward together. You don't need a fully formed question — just a real, current one, however big.
What this delivers: a stuck question gets a view that unlocks it — not once, but 3x a year, so you build rhythm instead of getting helped a single time.
You bring a different view
You don't have a question, but an expertise from outside L&D — art, ecology, systemic therapy, philosophy — or you work somewhere learning happens outside the classroom: a museum, a festival, nature. You want that view to land on something bigger than your own daily practice. The learning perspective is already at the table, through Anneke, Bernd and the cohosts; you add something else.
What this delivers: you test your view against a real, complex organisational question, in contact with a group that takes learning seriously — and you bring a question of your own: how do you actually design a good learning experience?
The group thinks that through with you just as seriously. Reciprocal, in both directions.
